|
|
Work
programme 3: Develop/promote effective communication/learning
models for informed IPM decision making leading to higher, sustainable
and healthier harvests.
Background
The
success of IPM depends largely on how well farmers understand and combine
knowledge of biological and ecological processes with their farming experience
to develop/select options that reduce losses to pests, increase agricultural
productivity, manage risk, and meet the demands of local and global markets.
Globally, the IPM community is convinced that farmer participatory research
(FPR) and farmer participatory learning (FPL) ensure good communication
between researchers and farmers leading to integration of scientific and
indigenous knowledge to make research more understandable and useful.
| 

|
Towards
this end, the SP-IPM encourages mentored study exchange visits, participatory
learning sessions and establishes ‘pilot sites’ as part of
its implementation strategy to make more IPM options available in farming
communities, promote informed decision making by farmers to solve location-specific
problems, and assist participating organizations to gain experience in
developing effective research-farmer-extension partnerships. The pilot
sites also serve as focal points for advocacy efforts to demonstrate the
usefulness and benefits of IPM research to decision-makers and thereby
help encourage the development and promotion of IPM-friendly policies
within their respective spheres of influence.
Principal
activities
- Develop/promote
participatory models for learning and adopting IPM
- Develop/promote
and apply guidelines for learning, promoting, and incorporating FPR
and FPL approaches into IPM and mainstream agriculture
- Train/orient
researchers, technicians, extension/field agents and project managers
to integrate FPR and PL approaches in IPM.
- Establish
pilot sites to promote closer collaboration among partner organizations
and increase farmers’ capacity to investigate and solve pest constraints
more effectively
- Develop
mechanisms for large scale uptake of proven IPM development and learning
approaches and of farmer-proven IPM technologies.
Top |
| Achievements |
|
-
12
frontline project staff completed 7-10 days of mentored
reciprocal exchange visits between pairs of projects/programs
with contrasting FPR and PL approaches across agroecologies
and cultures projects in Latin America, Asia and Africa
- 43
participants (IPM facilitators, researchers, extensionists, project
managers) from 24 different countries and representing the different
partners jointly analyzed study tour case studies and experiences
at a global
learning workshop
-
Guidelines on the principles and practices
of FPR/FPL that underpin successful IPM developed for IPM practitioners
(being developed as an IPM brief)
- A
common vision developed on what various stakeholders would need
to do differently in order to increase the effectiveness of participatory
approaches in IPM
- SP-IPM
revitalized international
consensus and collaboration to promote IPM of parasitic weeds
in cereal–legume cropping systems in Africa. The stakeholder
groups involved are SP-IPM partner research organizations, the
Pan-African Striga Control Network (PASCON), the Agriculture Department
of FAO’s Regional Office for Africa (FAORAFA), AU’s
Semi-Arid Food Grains Research and Development programme (AU/SAFGRAD),
and the FAO/Global IPM Facility
- SP-IPM
pilot sites on parasitic
weeds have graduated into FAO/TCP regional projects for Orobanche
in food legumes in North Africa (6 countries) and Striga in staple
cereals in West Africa (3 countries)
|
|